For Senior Investment Decision Makers
The investment landscape surrounding Israeli-Palestinian territory has undergone significant transformation in 2024-2025, creating new challenges for institutional investors navigating competing regulatory pressures.
Recent International Court of Justice rulings, combined with evolving EU due diligence requirements and shifts in third-party ESG risk assessment coverage, have prompted major institutional investors—from Dutch pension funds to the Church of England—to reassess their exposure strategies.
Beyond core International Humanitarian Law (IHL) violations, investors face compounding exposure through sanctions enforcement (BNP Paribas $8.9bn precedent), corporate complicity frameworks (Lafarge, Dutch cases), and supply chain due diligence obligations across multiple overlapping legal regimes.
This briefing examines the regulatory, legal, and reputational considerations facing non-US institutional investors as they balance EU compliance obligations against US political pressure, and explores how institutions can adopt IHL-grounded exclusion strategies as a risk management approach.
Read the full Executive Briefing here.
__________________________________________________________________________